Recent content by Jason@DizzyTuning

Also check your CL Max Load tables. Those can cause some wonky behavior when over 2.5 load (I didn't look at log).

Typically, a lean condition is either improper maf calibration or a leak pre-turbo. Have you thoroughly inspected all the silicone pre-turbo, including your bypass valve hose?

Hey, it's no problem at all bud! I'm a drama-free guy. You'll learn that about me. Lol. I just want my customers to be happy, that is my main concern. Email me (3) logs on the most recent map, and I'll have a revision for you tonight!

Hey guys, I just wanted to pop on here and see if I can help. I had a look at the log you had posted, and I can tell that is one of your E85 mix tunes. Those maps are targeting 11.8:1. I'm not sure where 11.1 came from, that may have been a typo. Sorry about that! So 11.7-11.9, is right on...

I ran the ACT street/strip clutch, which is a full face disc. But, I believe it uses the same pressure plate as the 6 puck kit. I did not like pedal feel and engagement at all with this clutch. The pedal felt like I was going to blow one of my hydraulic lines, and the engagement was so brutal...

Haha, you guys are funny! I'm really happy to hear you are enjoying the tune! I should throw out another option of adding methanol injection. You can get similar power increases to an e-mix, AND the wife would not have to mix fuels. :)

I'll have to take a look at this in the morning, cause I may be confusing two Brian's. Lol. I'm also confused at the map that is posted in the OP, because I don't name my base map's "base map". Regardless, we will get this issue resolved.

Once again, @Redline is spot on. The stock sized maf housing calibration compared to the Cobb maf housing may cause a .1-.2 afr deviation, but not as large as we are seeing. We just started troubleshooting this issue and the first thing I have informed Brian to check is the complete intake...

Let's do this! My turnaround right now is 1-2 days between revisions.