60-100 times
- Thread starter mangosmoothie
- Start date
mituc
Greenie N00B Member
60-100mph (96-161Kmph) 3.703s.
Modifications at that time: built engine with 4032 Custom SP63 Mahle pistons stock 87.5mm bore, GTX3071R gen1, CP-e TMIC, catted UR downpipe, catted & resonated UR test pipe, Cobb catback, JBR Tru 3" Silicone intake, CorkSport airbox, CoolingMist WMI with a CM10 nozzle + another Snow Performance #3 nozzle, stock intake manifold with light porting and VTCS delete, stock EM with EGR fully functional, self-versatuned.
The car was in full street trim, 2/3 full tank, Michelin PS4 225/40/R18 tires, with me alone in it (175lb).
In the attached log the car has 60mph (96kmph) at line 15 timestamp 1861.866s and reaches 100mph/161kmph at line 38 timestamp 1865.569s.
Log was done on flat surface, 6Kmph/4mph lateral wind, 4th gear, 18C/64F ambient, TC on (so don't mind the knock retard it's because going over small bumps/cracks or loosing traction momentarily over invisible sand/dirt patches).
P.S.: videoclip title says 3.62s because back then I was calculating 60-100mph for 96-160kmph which is still probably a bit more accurate than 96-161 (60-100mph is basically 96.5kmph to 160.9, so closer to a 64kmph difference than to a 65).
Modifications at that time: built engine with 4032 Custom SP63 Mahle pistons stock 87.5mm bore, GTX3071R gen1, CP-e TMIC, catted UR downpipe, catted & resonated UR test pipe, Cobb catback, JBR Tru 3" Silicone intake, CorkSport airbox, CoolingMist WMI with a CM10 nozzle + another Snow Performance #3 nozzle, stock intake manifold with light porting and VTCS delete, stock EM with EGR fully functional, self-versatuned.
The car was in full street trim, 2/3 full tank, Michelin PS4 225/40/R18 tires, with me alone in it (175lb).
In the attached log the car has 60mph (96kmph) at line 15 timestamp 1861.866s and reaches 100mph/161kmph at line 38 timestamp 1865.569s.
Log was done on flat surface, 6Kmph/4mph lateral wind, 4th gear, 18C/64F ambient, TC on (so don't mind the knock retard it's because going over small bumps/cracks or loosing traction momentarily over invisible sand/dirt patches).
P.S.: videoclip title says 3.62s because back then I was calculating 60-100mph for 96-160kmph which is still probably a bit more accurate than 96-161 (60-100mph is basically 96.5kmph to 160.9, so closer to a 64kmph difference than to a 65).