I'm kind of lost as to why you guys are comparing logs and spool at all, let alone on different setups.
Isn't the real issue and largest concern of this development, potential catastrophic failure of the silicone piping? I don't recall reduced spool even being an advertised benefit of this kit, could be wrong there. However, a couple hundred RPM of spool makes no difference either way if the risk of the piping failing altogether is remotely possible. Pop a coupler on the side of the road or at the track, its fairly easy to fix. Blow a hole in the entire cold or hot side silicone piping, and you need a tow.
I think the real question here is, what was the point of failure when tested? What kind of longevity tests have been done and under what conditions? If it has actually been proven that this repeated flexing does not reduce the lifespan or add stress to the silicone, then by all means worry about a couple hundred rpm worth of spool.
I may have missed something in all of this.
I'm not concerned at all with spool/boost threshold. Based on dozens of logs, the data doesn't bear that out for me, so it's a non-issue. I'm moderately concerned about failure, specifically it happening at an inopportune time, like when I'm driving 5 hours down to San Antonio with my wife and daughter. It makes me feel better to know folks are running a good deal more than my 25 psi with no issues. And ultimately, I know JBR will take care of me. I don't want to be stranded, though.