Good thread, and I appreciate that you've done a ton of research. Nothing like bein' well-informed.
I didn't notice if it was mentioned, but another consideration regarding motor mounts is power level. If you decide to do the simple AP + internals, intake, test pipe, RMM, with ethanol (bang-for-the-buck combo) one day, you should easily hit 300/350 @ the wheels (up from ~230/260 @ the wheels stock). IMHO, this is a big enough power difference that you may want more than just a RMM. Sounds like you want to maintain the warranty coverage for now though, so just a thought with an eye toward the future.
I will say that at ~385/380, I'm very happy to be fully Damond mounted. I've had other mounts before, but I think this is the best combo in terms of a very solid performance bias while still retaining a modicum of DD-liveability. My balance shafts are intact too, because going to that level is just too much for me.
Also, bear in mind that durometer is just a measure of the material's hardness, and though related to amount of NVH is only one of many influential factors. The size of the bushing itself, and particularly the geometry of the mount's design can have a far greater impact on NVH. It is err to say, for instance, that an 88d would transmit more NVH than a 75 unless the ONLY variable is the bushing material itself. That's one of the reasons I like the DM mounts so much. They limit movement very well, but transmit less NVH than comparable mounts due to their design.
TL;DR just things to keep in mind regarding mounts if you ever want to start pushing your power level, which most folks end up doing in the end, LOL
I didn't notice if it was mentioned, but another consideration regarding motor mounts is power level. If you decide to do the simple AP + internals, intake, test pipe, RMM, with ethanol (bang-for-the-buck combo) one day, you should easily hit 300/350 @ the wheels (up from ~230/260 @ the wheels stock). IMHO, this is a big enough power difference that you may want more than just a RMM. Sounds like you want to maintain the warranty coverage for now though, so just a thought with an eye toward the future.
I will say that at ~385/380, I'm very happy to be fully Damond mounted. I've had other mounts before, but I think this is the best combo in terms of a very solid performance bias while still retaining a modicum of DD-liveability. My balance shafts are intact too, because going to that level is just too much for me.
Also, bear in mind that durometer is just a measure of the material's hardness, and though related to amount of NVH is only one of many influential factors. The size of the bushing itself, and particularly the geometry of the mount's design can have a far greater impact on NVH. It is err to say, for instance, that an 88d would transmit more NVH than a 75 unless the ONLY variable is the bushing material itself. That's one of the reasons I like the DM mounts so much. They limit movement very well, but transmit less NVH than comparable mounts due to their design.
TL;DR just things to keep in mind regarding mounts if you ever want to start pushing your power level, which most folks end up doing in the end, LOL
Last edited: