Yet another satisfied Damond mounts customer. I really can't recommend them highly enough
Stage 2 RMM for Mazdaspeed!
- Thread starter Barett@ContriveDesignInnovations
- Start date
MrMS3
Greenie N00B Member
modusoperandi
Greenie N00B Member
Highly considering on purchasing one despite just having purchased a RMM from Matt Damond.
I say purchase it and make an unbiased comparison of the two. I'm sure many would be interested in the pros and cons of both products.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
modusoperandi
Greenie N00B Member
Most definitely I am just waiting to get my check to put some cash towards the mount to see if it works better than the Matt Damond one.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
UnknownReagent
Greenie N00B Member
I have all 3 Damond mounts and I love them but I think the new CS RMM could potentially be better due to the geometry. I'm really eager to see a back to back comparison of the 2.
UnknownReagent
Greenie N00B Member
Any followup on this?
Send me one and I'll tell you the difference between the Damond and the CS with a built motor
Just a clarifying question: do you mean "better" in terms of performance, NVH, or both? Personally, better for me would be performance prioritized first, but if it could do that and have lower NVH too, that'd be awesome, though the DM RMM isn't that bad at all compared to previous RMMs I've had.
UnknownReagent
Greenie N00B Member
Based on the force vectors in the CS RMM, I think it's possible you'd see reduced engine movement with reduced/same NVH. Both are important to me since my car is a DD and it's already pretty loud but I also hate drivetrain slop and crappy shift-feel.
That said, it might also be the case that there isn't any perceptible improvement to be made over the Damond RMM.
That said, it might also be the case that there isn't any perceptible improvement to be made over the Damond RMM.