Intake Manifold

Supposedly flows as much as the JMF, but superior aerodynamics/smoother flow path? o.0 And at ~$300 or so instead of $800-$900, this looks to be a total win. I wonder where we'll mount our MAP sensors, though. They're on the IC on ST's, IIRC.
 
Redline said:
Just out of curiosity, if the the ST is bolt-on fit, then wouldn't options like this be viable too?
http://www.turbotechracing.com/productcart/pc/viewPrd.asp?idproduct=5517
Click to expand...

Not necessarily... depending on the pu, juan, and the MS6, the factory ST manifold has to be modified to fit. So other manifolds for the ST platform could work with our components, but would need to be modified as well. Also, we'll be posting flow data soon, and it's awesome.

I don't even know why companies sell manifold on the ST platform, when the factory one works soooooooooooo well.
 
Looking forward to flow bench data, once you're willing to release that info anyway you can get one over to @AYOUSTIN so that we can have it tested on the same benches as the others he has done?
 
Matt@DM said:
Not necessarily... depending on the pu, juan, and the MS6, the factory ST manifold has to be modified to fit. So other manifolds for the ST platform could work with our components, but would need to be modified as well. Also, we'll be posting flow data soon, and it's awesome.

I don't even know why companies sell manifold on the ST platform, when the factory one works soooooooooooo well.
Click to expand...
Sweet! Finally some 10-year-newer tech on an MZR DISI engine's cousin that's trickling down for us! :D
 
Has anyone else seen this yet (found linked on another forum)? The flow on these stock ST IM's is truly astounding, especially the fact that they have <2% flow imbalance between cylinders (less than a third the JMF's imbalance). Looks like they'll support 700whp easy, so long as they can handle the boost levels. I need one of these yesterday:

http://www.focusst.org/forum/speed-perf6rmanc3/25992-stock-intake-manifold-flow-data.html

Edit: not trying to steal DM's thunder in releasing their test results; just excited to see DM duplicate the amazing flow this link suggests. Besides, I couldn't imagine not sharing these #s :D
 
Last edited:
LOLWRX said:
Will we be able to keep our factory egr intact using this manifold??
Click to expand...

Nope. You could potentially make it work though. We may offer our EGR delete kits as an option with the manifold, for people who do not already have one.

Awafrican said:
Looking forward to flow bench data, once you're willing to release that info anyway you can get one over to @AYOUSTIN so that we can have it tested on the same benches as the others he has done?
Click to expand...

We're looking forward to posting it up. Also, maybe we already had gotten one over to Austin ;)

Rokusek said:
Money for the company and looks good in the engine bay.

Either way, I am excited for this as you already know.
Click to expand...

Pretty much.
 
Matt@DM said:
Nope. You could potentially make it work though. We may offer our EGR delete kits as an option with the manifold, for people who do not already have one.



We're looking forward to posting it up. Also, maybe we already had gotten one over to Austin ;)



Pretty much.
Click to expand...
Well now I'm even more excited
 
Damn $50 fpr the mani. Im in with a good solution for tb and cold pipe. Guess this means egr and vtcs delete for me
 
blackms3_71 said:
Damn $50 fpr the mani. Im in with a good solution for tb and cold pipe. Guess this means egr and vtcs delete for me
Click to expand...
Hopefully they make the resistor fix to "trick" the ECU not to throw VTCS codes readily available as part of any kit. Those of us running catless already have 1 code. EGR-less throws 2 more. We don't need another code(s) for VTCS (depending on our state inspection laws/number of not readys allowed).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Thread viewers

Number of users viewing the thread: 1
Back
Top